Bukti Validitas dan Penerapan Structured Oral Case Analysis (SOCA) pada Pendidikan Kedokteran di Indonesia: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur
Abstract
Developing core clinical reasoning skills is a mandatory educational goal for all medical students. The Structured Oral Case Analysis (SOCA) is widely utilized as an assessment method for evaluating these competencies. This study sought to systematically examine the local application and psychometric support for SOCA within Indonesian medical programs. A comprehensive literature review was conducted covering publications from 2015 to 2025, utilizing relevant English and Indonesian search terms across various academic databases. Articles were subsequently systematically screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria through a review of titles and abstracts. The analysis revealed three central themes: assessment terminology, execution practices, and evidence of validation for the SOCA method. Notably, terminological inconsistencies were found across Indonesian institutions despite standardized methods. Furthermore, documentation regarding implementation practices primarily details time allocation and assessment rubrics. While evidence supports concurrent validity, content validity, and inter-rater reliability, this validation is restricted to the module assessment level. Crucially, validation for SOCA in a high-stakes assessment context is currently absent from the literature. In summary, the current psychometric profile confirms that SOCA is a valid and reliable tool for low-stakes assessment applications within Indonesian medical education.
Downloads
References
Wu E, Larson S, Chacko-Stacey A, et al. The Value of Oral Examinations and the Role it Plays in Medical Student Education. 2022.
Holzinger A, Lettner S, Steiner-Hofbauer V, et al. How to assess? Perceptions and preferences of undergraduate medical students concerning traditional assessment methods. BMC Medical Education 2020; 20: 312.
Kang D, Goico S, Ghanbari S, et al. Providing an oral examination as an authentic assessment in a large section, undergraduate diversity class. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2022; 13.
Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Medical Education 2003; 37: 830-837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x.
Febriza A and Fitria A. Analyzing the correlation of oral examination with soca and written examination using MCQ on medical students. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education; 11: 444-450.
Atik N, Talitha D, Dwiwina RG, et al. Correlation between academic evaluation scores within the undergraduate medical education: a cross-sectional study. Indian J Pharm Educ Res 2020; 54: 567-573.
Syukri NRM, Pratiwi YS, Ariyanto EF, et al. Correlation between weekly formative and summative assessment of medical students in multidisciplinary examination and oral examination reproductive system block. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education 2021; 10: 298-305.
Alfandy BP, Pamungkasari EP, Salsabila LA, et al. The Variety of Undergraduate Medical Education Curricula: An Environmental Scan of Diverse Medical School Characteristics within Indonesia. Education in Medicine Journal 2024; 16.
Sari SM. Validitas dan Reabilitas Metode Penilaian Students Oral Case Analysis (SOCA) pada Mahasiswa Tahap Sarjana Kedokteran. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education 2013; 2: 97-100.
Pandhita G, Putranti RA, Lakshmi BS, et al. Online student oral case analysis during COVID-19 Pandemic: a case study. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education 2021; 10: 133-139.
Putranti RA, Emilia O and Suryadi E. Validitas dan reliabilitas ujian SOCA (students oral case analysis): Studi di salah satu fakultas kedokteran di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education 2016; 5: 148-156.
Maharani CT, Rahman PHA and Dwiwina RG. Correlation of multiple choice examination scores with oral examination scores of the second year undergraduate program faculty of medicine Universitas Padjadjaran in academic year 2019/2020. KESANS: International Journal of Health and Science 2022; 1: 581-588.
Makkiyah FA, Susatiningsih T and Nurrizka RH. Correlation MCQ with other assesment of first year medical students. In: Seminar Nasional Riset Kedokteran 2021.
Van Der Vleuten CP. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Advances in Health Sciences Education 1996; 1: 41-67.
Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, et al. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Medical teacher 2011; 33: 206-214.
Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990; 65: S63-67. 1990/09/01. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045.
Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, et al. Assessment of clinical competence. The lancet 2001; 357: 945-949.
Schuwirth LW and Van der Vleuten CP. Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Medical teacher 2011; 33: 478-485.
Davis MH and Karunathilake I. The place of the oral examination in today's assessment systems. Medical teacher 2005; 27: 294-297.
Wakeford R, Southgate L and Wass V. Improving oral examinations: selecting, training, and monitoring examiners for the MRCGP. Bmj 1995; 311: 931-935.
Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal 2019; 11: 49-54.
Artino AR, Jr., La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, et al. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Med Teach 2014; 36: 463-474. 2014/03/26. DOI: 10.3109/0142159x.2014.889814.
Copyright (c) 2026 Yoana Priska

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







