Evaluation and Selection of Robotic Process Automation Platforms Using the AHP–Topsis Method: A Case Study in the Banking Industry

  • Diah Kumalasari Universitas Indonesia
  • Achmad Nizar Hidayanto Universitas Indonesia
Keywords: Analytical Hierarchy Process, Banking, Robotic Process Automation Technology Selection, TOPSIS

Abstract

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) has become a key technology for improving efficiency and accuracy in operational processes within the banking sector. However, increasing organizational complexity and regulatory demands make the selection of an appropriate RPA platform a challenging decision. This study aims to identify the most suitable RPA platform using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach by integrating the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The evaluation framework is developed based on a hierarchical structure consisting of six main criteria and sixteen sub-criteria, including technology, cost efficiency, compliance, user experience, vendor and implementation support, as well as analytics and monitoring. Four alternatives were compared: UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Power Automate, and Kofax. The AHP weighting results indicate that compliance, technology, and cost efficiency are the most influential criteria in RPA platform selection. The TOPSIS analysis shows that Power Automate achieves the highest relative closeness value (Ci = 0.7344), followed by UiPath (Ci = 0.4604). Based on these findings, Power Automate is identified as the most suitable RPA platform for supporting banking process automation. The study recommends a hybrid RPA implementation strategy whereby Power Automate is adopted as the primary solution and UiPath is used as a complementary platform for complex automation scenarios. The results of this research are expected to serve as a basis for strategic decision-making to support the banks ongoing digital transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gqaleni, T. M., & Bhengu, B. R. (2020). Analysis of Patient Safety Incident reporting system as an indicator of quality nursing in critical care units in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Health SA Gesondheid, 25. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v25i0.1263

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, J. B., & Anderson, R. F. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Kemenkes. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2017 tentang Keselamatan Pasien. Jakarta: Berita Negara Republik Indonesia.

Pramesona, B. A., Sukohar, A., Taneepanichskul, S., & Rasyid, M. F. A. (2023). A qualitative study of the reasons for low patient safety incident reporting among Indonesian nurses. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 76(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0583

Tristantia, A. D. (2018). Evaluasi Sistem Pelaporan Insiden Keselamatan Pasien di Rumah Sakit. Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia, 6(2), 83. https://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v6i2.2018.83-94

WHO. (2020). Patient Safety Incident Reporting and Learning Systems: Technical Report and Guidance. World Health Organization.

Jamaludin dan Endang Ruswanti. (2017). Impact of Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction on Customer Loyalty : A Case Study in a Private Hospital in Indonesia. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM). Vol.19, No.5, 23-33.

Published
2026-03-02